The first time I watched an accounts payable team during month end I felt like I was standing on a factory floor where half the machinery had been switched off. Invoices drifted through inboxes. Spreadsheets multiplied. Approvals stalled while vendors waited. Everyone worked hard yet flow was broken. That scene is still common. The tools are newer. The delays feel the same.
Finance teams sit at the choke point of every organisation. Cash leaves. Risk concentrates. Audit asks hard questions when something slips. AI can help but only if we design for the work as it is. Not the work we wish we had. This is a story about getting from stuck to steady.
Where the time really goes
Invoice processing is not a single task. It is a chain. Capture the document. Read the fields. Validate against the purchase order. Match lines. Code to the right ledger and tax treatment. Route for approval. Post to the ERP. Pay on time. Each link steals minutes. Worse: each break throws a person into detective mode.
Common traps show up almost everywhere:
- PDFs that look crisp on screen yet fail extraction once you meet a new layout
- Purchase orders missing line level detail so three way match is guesswork
- Vendor master full of duplicates so checks on bank details are manual
- Email threads that obscure the latest state so people reply in circles
- Controls bolted on at the end which turns a small exception into a long escalation
The result is predictable. Cycle time stretches. First pass yield stays low. Duplicate payments slip through when pressure peaks. Early payment discounts expire. The team’s week becomes a collection of emergencies.
What changes when we do it properly
AI helps when it pulls friction out of the flow. That starts with clear decision points. At each step we ask a simple question. What must be true for this invoice to move forward. Then we apply the right capability for that moment.
- Capture: Ingest emails and portal downloads into a single queue. Auto split multi invoice PDFs. De-duplicate by supplier, total, invoice number and date.
- Read: Use layout aware document models rather than brittle templates. Keep a labelled set of invoices from all your real suppliers. Retrain on errors monthly. Accuracy matters more than clever prompts.
- Validate: Check supplier ID, PO number, currency and tax registration against your master. Snap totals to line sum within a small tolerance. Reject when key fields are missing with a readable reason code.
- Match: For PO backed invoices run a strict two or three way match. Where line descriptions are vague use fuzzy matching with unit price and quantity as anchors. Never post on a fuzzy match alone.
- Code: For non PO invoices predict GL account, cost centre and tax code using historical patterns plus supplier context. Show confidence. If low then send for quick human confirmation.
- Approve: Route by policy not by folklore. Amount thresholds. Cost centre. Category. When someone is on leave hand off automatically with a visible trail.
- Post and pay: Post only after controls pass. Keep an audit trail with the extracted fields, source file, rule decisions and human touches. Trigger payment in line with terms or discount windows.
When this is live in the real system the day feels different. The queue moves. Exceptions surface early. People spend time fixing root causes instead of rekeying.
The thin slice that proves value
I rarely advise big bang. Finance does not need heroics. It needs a thin slice that touches the end to end path. Start with three scenarios which cover most volume.
- PO backed invoice with clean data: Capture to post with automated three way match. Measure first pass yield and cycle time from arrival to posting.
- Non PO service invoice: Predict coding then route to the right approver. Measure touch time and error rate on coding.
- Duplicate payment defence: Scan the ledger and the current queue for potential duplicates. Use supplier, amount, date, purchase order and bank details. Measure prevented duplicates and the false positive rate.
Build this in the real environment. Connect to your ERP. Use your actual vendor master. Run for four weeks with a willing group. Instrument everything. Decide what to scale or stop.
Data work that cannot be skipped
Most failures are not model problems. They are data problems hiding in plain sight.
- Vendor master: Collapse duplicates. Standardise names. Lock bank details behind a maker checker process. Tag reliable suppliers versus new ones so thresholds vary intelligently.
- PO quality: Push for line level detail. Unit price. Quantity. Tax flags. Delivery location. If your POs are vague then matching will create noise.
- Chart of accounts: Map historical invoice patterns to GL codes and cost centres. Clean the long tail of random coding. A model cannot learn from chaos.
- Document diversity: Keep a reference set of invoices that actually represent your supplier base. Include the ugly scans and the odd layouts. This set is your truth for evaluation.
This work is unglamorous. It pays back quickly once the system is live.
Controls must be designed in not bolted on
Finance lives under policy for good reasons. AI does not remove that duty. It raises the bar.
- Keep role based access strict. Who can see bank details. Who can change them. Who can post to the ledger.
- Record a full audit trail. Source file. Extracted fields. Model version. Rules hit. Human decisions. Timestamps.
- Use maker checker on sensitive changes. Bank details. Supplier creation. Tax rules. Block self approval at every point.
- Test for silent failure. Build alerts for drift in extraction accuracy or match rates. When the numbers move you want to know within hours.
When risk is handled early the conversations with audit go faster. The team sleeps better too.
The people side that decides success
Automation changes the shape of work. If you assume time saved will magically convert to value you will be disappointed. Plan it.
- Redesign roles for exception handling and supplier enablement. Give people authority to fix upstream causes rather than patch symptoms.
- Teach the team how to judge AI confidence. A 98 percent confidence on PO number can be auto posted. A 65 percent confidence on VAT code needs a review. Make the thresholds explicit.
- Refresh KPIs. Move from count of invoices processed to flow efficiency and first time right. Reward fewer exceptions not more keystrokes.
When the team understands the new flow adoption climbs. Morale improves because the work gets less tedious.
A grounded example
A mid sized distributor approached us after yet another quarter with late payments and upset suppliers. Two ERPs after a merger. Ten thousand invoices per month. Heavy email dependence. We started with the thin slice. Capture into a unified queue. Layout aware extraction with a curated evaluation set. Strict three way match for the top two hundred suppliers. Non PO coding with confidence thresholds. Duplicate detection before posting.
The first month was rough. Extraction fell on certain courier invoices with tiny fonts. We adjusted pre processing to sharpen scans. Several POs lacked line items. We worked with procurement to enforce detail at the point of raising. Duplicate detection flagged too many false positives around round number totals. We tightened the window and required two matching attributes not one.
By month three the numbers moved. Average cycle time dropped from nine days to four. First pass yield on PO invoices rose from 54 percent to 82 percent. Duplicate payments fell to near zero. The team redeployed two full time equivalents from manual coding to vendor enablement and dispute prevention. None of this was magic. It was flow plus persistence.
Beyond invoices: where to extend next
Once the basic path is stable you can expand without breaking the system.
- Vendor onboarding: Intelligent form checks for tax IDs and bank details with real time validation against public registries where lawful. Automatic risk scoring to route high risk suppliers to enhanced due diligence.
- Expense audit: Auto classify spend. Flag policy violations. Summarise receipts and highlight missing evidence. Route back with a clear fix list.
- Cash allocation: Read remittance advices. Match to open items. Suggest allocations with confidence scores. Human confirms the edge cases.
- Close support: Suggest accruals based on unbilled goods received and prior patterns. Generate variance narratives that reference the actual journal lines. Controller signs off.
- Forecasting: Use approved invoices and purchase orders to project near term cash needs. Surface discount opportunities and looming late fees.
Treat each as a new thin slice. Keep controls tight. Measure before and after.
What to measure so you know it is working
- Cycle time from invoice arrival to posting
- Touch time per invoice
- First pass yield by scenario
- Exception rate with reason codes
- Duplicate payment prevention rate
- Cost per invoice processed
- Early payment discounts captured
- Supplier queries resolved within target time
Dashboards are not the point. These numbers guide trade offs. They also show when drift or upstream problems creep back in.
Risks worth naming
Two risks appear consistently. First is silent error. A system that posts fast but wrong will hurt you. Keep confidence thresholds conservative at the start. Audit regularly. Second is dependence on one clever person. If only one builder knows how the prompts and rules fit together you have fragile operations. Document the runbook. Spread the knowledge.
Security deserves equal weight. Vendor bank details are sensitive. Guard them. Keep data retention tight. Limit what leaves your network. Encrypt in transit and at rest. Plain advice trumps glossy features.
A forward view
Accounts payable will not vanish. It will become an exception management and supplier enablement function. The heavy lifting will be handled by systems that read, match, decide and record with speed. The human work will concentrate on fixing root causes and improving relationships. That future is not distant. It arrives one thin slice at a time.
If you are overwhelmed by where to start choose one flow. Pick invoices from a stable group of suppliers. Build a small end to end path that actually posts to the ledger. Measure it. Mend what breaks. Then extend. The breakthrough is not a grand platform. It is a steady shift from detective work to designed flow.